Case of neuromyelitis otica: bilateral sensorineural hearing loss and transverse myelopathy following intrathecal chemotherapy

  1. Sergio A Castillo-Torres ,
  2. Carlos A Soto-Rincón ,
  3. Héctor J Villarreal-Montemayor and
  4. Beatriz Chávez-Luévanos
  1. Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario "Dr José E. González", Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
  1. Correspondence to Dr Sergio A Castillo-Torres; sergio.castillotr@uanl.edu.mx

Publication history

Accepted:02 Apr 2020
First published:15 Apr 2020
Online issue publication:15 Apr 2020

Case reports

Case reports are not necessarily evidence-based in the same way that the other content on BMJ Best Practice is. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice. Please check the date of publication.

Abstract

Neurotoxicity from intrathecally administered chemotherapeutic drugs is frequent, particularly with some agents like methotrexate, which are more prone to developing adverse effects. Myelopathy ranks among the most frequently reported neurological entities; with the diagnosis being straightforward, after ruling out infectious, metabolic, autoimmune or paraneoplastic causes. Scarcity of cases precludes evidence-based recommendations for the management of these complications. The most common therapeutic approach consists of the suspension of chemotherapy, exclusion of infectious and neoplastic causes, with prompt administration of high-dose steroids. We report a 21-year-old patient with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, who developed acute transverse myelitis and bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, after five rounds of intrathecal methotrexate and cytarabine. Although neurotoxicity from both agents has been documented, this combination has not been previously reported.

Background

Neurotoxicity of chemotherapeutic agents is well recognised, with the route of administration and the agent used being the main determinants of toxicity.1 In the case of intrathecal chemotherapy (ITC), serious neurological adverse events have been reported in around 8.3% of patients, and in 3.1% of treatments.2 However, myelopathy has been reported as the most frequent complication, particularly after methotrexate (MTX) administration.1 3 Although cytarabine (ARA-C) is another agent frequently associated with myelopathy, it’s neurotoxicity is not exclusive of IT administration.4 Ascertaining chemotherapy as the cause of myelopathy requires a careful and thorough evaluation to rule out infectious (eg, HIV or syphilis), metabolic (eg, cobalamin or copper deficiency, excess zinc intake), vascular (dural arteriovenous fistula), autoimmune or paraneoplastic causes. Hearing loss represents unusual toxicity, which has been rarely associated with MTX and ARA-C.5 6 We present the case of a 21-year-old male with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, who developed acute transverse myelitis and bilateral sensorineural hearing loss following five rounds of intrathecal methotrexate and cytarabine, (along with intravenous doxorubicin and vincristine), a previously unreported association, without initial evidence of injury by imaging or audiometry, but further documented by neurophysiological studies.

Case presentation

A 21-year-old male was diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) and received five chemotherapy sessions with intravenous doxorubicin and vincristine, and intrathecal MTX, ARA-C and dexamethasone. During the fifth ITC administration, he reports to have developed dizziness and headache, and after the administration had finished, he lost consciousness. On regaining consciousness he was completely deaf, paraplegic with abolished sensory modalities up to his chest and unable to control sphincters. Chemotherapy was halted and the patient was diagnosed with an acute medullary syndrome of unknown (non-infectious neither neoplastic) aetiology; thus prednisone (1 mg/kg) was prescribed during 21 days, without improvement.

During the following 4 months, the patient had incomplete recovery of motor (MRC 2/5) and sensory function (sustained absent pain, temperature, vibration and joint position sense), hearing loss and sphincter control remained unchanged. He was referred to our hospital, to continue treatment for ALL. Haematological consultation ruled out an active neoplastic process, and the patient was referred to the neurology outpatient clinic to determine the cause of the myelopathy.

Neurological examination was carried out through a series of written commands and questions to the patient who after reading them, would then answer loud and clear or perform what was requested. Mental status examination and higher cortical functions were unremarkable. On cranial nerve examination bilateral complete sensorineural hearing loss was found. Upper limbs were normal, lower limb evaluation revealed a spastic paraparesis with bilateral increased tone, 1/5 strength, hyperreflexia and sensory level at T5 with loss of all sensory modalities below this level with bilateral extensor plantar responses. Gait and coordination could not be evaluated. Anal tone was severely diminished. At follow-up 1 month later, strength had improved to 3/5, but patient was unable to weight bare and sphincter function was unchanged.

Investigations

Neuroimaging of the brain and complete spinal cord at the time the patient was evaluated at our hospital was unremarkable (figure 1), as was the imaging done initially. HIV and syphilis were ruled out through antibody testing (fourth-generation ELISA, and anti-treponemal antibodies). Lumbar puncture revealed an absent cell count, with a normal level of glucose, proteins and lactate. Somatosensory evoked potentials were performed revealing an impairment of nerve conduction at spinal cord level (figure 2), and auditory brainstem response evoked potentials revealing bilateral impairment of conduction at the cochlear nerve level (figure 3), confirming thus the presence of damage at both levels.

Figure 1

MRI imaging. Sagittal T2 (A) and contrast-enhanced T1 (B) weighted image of the dorsal spinal cord without abnormalities.

Figure 2

Somatosensory evoked potentials. Lower extremity somatosensory evoked potentials reveal bilateral prolonged latencies in N11, P37 and N45, with severely prolonged latency differences, more severe for the left side; suggestive of abnormal conduction at the spinal cord level.

Figure 3

Auditory evoked potentials. Auditory evoked brainstem response potentials reveal bilateral prolonged latencies in waves III and V, more severe for the left side, with normal interpeak latencies; suggestive of cochlear nerve damage.

Differential diagnosis

The differential diagnosis was narrow because of the likelihood of an adverse drug reaction was, according to the scale designed by Naranjo et al: previous (but separate) reports of myelopathy or hearing loss with intrathecal chemotherapeutics, the close cause-effect relationship between administration and onset of symptoms and the improvement of the symptoms after discontinuation of chemotherapy, (reasonable) exclusion of alternative causes and the objective evidence of injury with evoked potentials.

Given the rarity of the case, it was discussed among the Neurology Service Faculty and Residents. It was concluded that the patient developed acute transverse myelopathy and bilateral sensorineural hearing loss as a consequence of intrathecal chemotherapy. It was also considered that vascular, infectious and inflammatory or autoimmune aetiologies were unlikely, because of normal imaging and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) profile, and the absence of systemic signs and symptoms (such as fever, malaise, weight loss). Metabolic causes, such as cobalamin, folate or copper deficiency (or excess zinc intake), were considered also unlikely because of the transverse nature of myelopathy without the involvement of upper limbs, against the selective involvement of dorsal column in the above-mentioned myelopathies, as well as the lack of haematological abnormalities. The possibility of neoplastic or paraneoplastic causes was also considered, but considered less likely given the negative CSF results.

Treatment

Supportive care, with physical therapy and rehabilitation. The patient was referred to a hearing loss clinic to be assessed to receive a hearing-aid device.

Outcome and follow-up

At 1 month follow-up (via text message), the patient reported he was able to walk aided (modified Rankin scale 3), but the hearing loss was unchanged.

Discussion

We report the first case of myelopathy and cochlear damage (therefore neuromyelitis otica) induced by ITC with MTX and ARA-C. Myelopathy has been reported to develop in less than 0.1% of patients who receive intrathecal MTX and ARA-C.3 7 No consistent risk factors have been identified for the development of myelopathy, thus pathophysiology of this complication remains unexplained.

Our case is also the first to report the full development of clinical symptoms immediately after intrathecal administration. The shortest time from administration to symptom-onset was reported in 6 hours.7 Although some authors have reported neck and back pain to develop immediately after administration, it took the patient 7 days to reach nadir of motor, sensory and autonomic deficits;8 subsequently, the same authors reported a median time of 15 days (range 6 to 30) from administration to onset of symptoms in a report from a larger sample.9 Furthermore, there is no definite clinical syndrome, the most consistently reported neurological deficits7–16 are shown in table 1; nor characteristic neuroimaging features the majority of cases had some degree of abnormality in magnetic resonance9 with some cases reporting arachnoiditis as a prominent feature.7

Table 1

Clinical manifestations of reported cases

Hearing loss Paraparesis Sensory loss Areflexia Sphincter dysfunction
Cersosimo et al 5 +
Marioni et al 6 +
Bay et al 7 + S +
Ozön et al 8
Pinnix et al 9 + + +
Gosavi et al 10 + D
Murata et al 12 + C + +
Maramattom et al 13 + D
Pan et al 14 + C + +
Tariq et al 15 + D +
Montejo et al 16 C +
Joseph et al 11 D
Castillo-Torres et al* + + C +
  • *Present case.

  • C, complete sensory loss; D, dorsal column involvement (selective); S, sparing of sensory modalities.

Regarding hearing loss, it has been reported with low-dose cytarabine5 and with methotrexate;6 thus ascribing toxicity to one of the agents is complicated. Neuroimaging of reported cases has been described as initially normal, and repeated imaging is suggested. We only found one report with neurophysiological studies,11 which are paramount to confirm the presence of neurological damage. For an excellent review on neurological toxicity associated with chemotherapy, we refer the reader to the article by Taillibert et al. 1

In our patient, an idiosyncratic effect seems the most likely possibility, given the direct cause-effect relationship, and gradual improvement; we cannot, however, exclude the possible contribution from infectious or inflammatory causes. The sudden and maximal deficit at the onset and slow recovery with high-dose steroids highly suggests an inflammatory component. Since cases are infrequent, the optimal diagnostic and therapeutic approach is uncertain, but evaluation of infectious, inflammatory or neoplastic aetiologies, suspension of chemotherapy and administration of high-dose steroids appears to be a reasonable and safe option. The outcome of ITC-related neurotoxicity is ominous; most cases persist with neurological deficit without improvement. However, it appears that those who develop neurological symptoms immediately after ITC administration, discontinue ITC and receive high-dose steroids promptly have a better functional outcome. Therefore, awareness regarding potential neurotoxicity is essential.

Learning points

  • Central nervous system toxicity with intrathecal chemotherapy is uncommon and lacks a defined syndrome.

  • Methotrexate is the most frequently reported agent to cause damage.

  • Myelopathy is the most commonly reported neurological manifestation.

  • Development of myelopathy should prompt to stop chemotherapy, exclude infectious causes and give high-dose steroids.

  • Myelopathy may not always be demonstrated by MRI, and somatosensoryevoked potentials are a useful supplementary test to document myelopathy.

Footnotes

  • Twitter @sactmd, @Casoto12360

  • Correction notice This article has been corrected since it was published Online First. The spelling error in the article title and discussion section has been corrected from "optica" to "otica".

  • Contributors SACT and CAS-R (neurology residents) contributed to the article conception, design and drafting. HJV-M (clinical neurophysiologist) performed and interpreted evoked potentials. HJV-M and BEC-L (professors of neurology) contributed to article design, revision for intellectually relevant content and critical review of the final manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer